Generate startup names that follow the conventions the sector actually uses: short, one word where possible, easy to spell after hearing it once, and viable as a domain. Filters for length and starting letter, and scores every result so a shortlist takes minutes rather than an afternoon.
Settings
Recent results
Generated locally in your browser β your settings and results never leave this page.
The conventions the sector actually follows
Startup naming has settled into a fairly narrow set of habits, and whether or not you like them, it is worth knowing what they are before you decide to break one.
Names run short, usually one word. They are frequently invented or blended rather than descriptive. They avoid the words that signal an older kind of company — Solutions, Systems, Group, Technologies — because those read as established rather than new, which is the opposite of the signal most startups want. And they are chosen with a domain in mind from the first day rather than the last.
This tool opens on short single words for that reason. You can widen it, but the default reflects where the category has landed.
Why the pressure toward short is real
It is easy to dismiss short names as fashion. They are not, quite. A startup name gets typed far more than most business names: into a browser, a search box, a signup form, a Slack channel, a support ticket. Every extra character is a small tax paid thousands of times, and every ambiguity is a small chance of ending up somewhere else.
Short names are also the ones that survive being a favicon, an app icon and a sender name, all of which a software company needs on day one rather than in year three.
The cost is that short names are the most contested. Anything obvious and short is long gone, which is exactly why blended and invented constructions dominate.
Naming for a company that will change
Most startups end up doing something adjacent to what they set out to do. A name that describes the original product becomes a liability at exactly the moment the company is finally working — you either keep a name that no longer fits or rename while trying to grow.
The practical guidance is to name the company for a quality, an idea or nothing at all, rather than for the mechanism. If you are naming the product rather than the company, the calculus is different and descriptive is often right; the two do not have to be the same name, and separating them early is cheaper than separating them later.
The domain question, honestly
The exact-match .com for anything short and real is almost certainly taken, and often expensively. That leaves three routes, each with a real cost.
Invent a word so the domain is genuinely free. Cheapest to secure, most expensive to teach.
Modify the domain — add a short prefix or suffix, or use a different extension. Fine, provided you accept that some share of traffic will reach whoever holds the plain .com and you cannot get it back.
Buy it. Sometimes correct, rarely early-stage money well spent.
This tool does not check availability and never claims a domain is free. The “Where to check” button opens the places to confirm it yourself, at the moment you need the answer.
Names that cause trouble at the next stage
A few choices are fine on day one and awkward later.
A name built on a current technology. Whatever is novel now will be ordinary in five years, and the name will date the company to its founding moment.
A deliberate misspelling of a common word. It solves the domain problem and creates a permanent one: the correctly spelled version is where people go by default.
A name that is hard to say in the markets you will expand into. Worth ten minutes of checking if you have any international ambition at all.
A name that boxes in the category. If the name contains the thing you sell today, expanding means renaming.
What the score is telling you
Every result is scored out of 100 on pronounceability, structure, likely spelling, length, syllable count and generic-word content, with the reasoning under “Why this score”.
For startup naming, weight length and spelling heavily and treat everything else as secondary. A name that is short and unambiguous when spoken has removed most of the friction a name can create. Whether it is a good name for your company is a judgement the score cannot make.
How much time this deserves
Naming absorbs more founder time than almost any other early decision, and the returns fall off sharply. Past a certain point you are not choosing better, you are choosing more slowly.
A workable budget is a few sessions across a week: generate widely, sleep on it, reduce, check the shortlist properly, decide. What makes that possible is having enough candidates to compare, which is why generating several rounds matters more than deliberating over any one result.
It is also worth remembering that the name matters less at the start than it will later. Almost nobody has heard it yet, so the cost of it being merely good rather than perfect is small, and the cost of spending three weeks on it is not.
Working a shortlist
Generate several rounds before you form an opinion, and save as you go rather than deciding on the spot. Then test three things.
Say the name in the sentence you will say most often: “Hi, I’m calling from ___.” Type it as a lowercase string with no spaces and look at it as an address. And show it to somebody outside the company and ask what they think you do — not to validate it, but to find out what it is actually signalling.
How to use the Startup Name Generator
- Optionally enter a word the company should be built around, or generate freely first.
- The tool opens on short single words, which is where the sector has landed — widen it if you want more range.
- Try the invented and blended styles; they are where free domains actually live.
- Press Generate startup names and run several rounds before judging anything.
- Save candidates as you go rather than deciding on the spot.
- Check domains and handles yourself with "Where to check" — availability is never claimed here.
Frequently asked questions
Why does it default to short, one-word names?
Because a startup name gets typed more than most business names — into browsers, search boxes, signup forms, channels and tickets. Every extra character is a small tax paid thousands of times and every ambiguity is a chance of landing somewhere else. Short names also survive being a favicon, an app icon and a sender name, all of which a software company needs immediately.
Should the name describe what we do?
Usually not, for the company. Most startups end up doing something adjacent to what they set out to do, and a name describing the original product becomes a liability exactly when the company starts working. Name the company for a quality or an idea, and let the product carry the descriptive name. They do not have to be the same word, and separating them early is cheaper than separating them later.
Every short domain I like is taken. What are my options?
Three, each with a real cost. Invent a word, which is cheapest to secure and most expensive to teach. Modify the domain with a short prefix, suffix or different extension, accepting that some traffic will reach whoever holds the plain .com and you cannot recover it. Or buy it, which is occasionally right and rarely a good use of early-stage money.
Does this check whether the domain is free?
No. It has no connection to any registrar, performs no lookups, and never claims a name is available. Availability changes constantly and a displayed verdict would be wrong often enough to be dangerous. Use "Where to check" on a result to confirm it yourself at the moment you need the answer.
What kinds of startup names cause problems later?
Names built on a current technology, which date the company to its founding moment. Deliberate misspellings of common words, where the correct spelling is where people go by default. Names that are hard to say in markets you plan to enter. And names containing the thing you sell today, which means expanding requires renaming.
Which part of the score should I pay attention to?
Length and likely spelling, and treat the rest as secondary. A name that is short and unambiguous when spoken has removed most of the friction a name can create. Whether it is a good name for your particular company is a judgement about market and meaning that the score cannot make — open "Why this score" to see exactly what it did assess.
Is anything I type sent to a server?
No. Generation runs entirely in your browser, the page works offline once loaded, nothing you type is uploaded, and saved names stay in your own browser. Your settings are deliberately not encoded into a shareable link.
